The idea of needing to earn God's love keeps rousing its ugly head here and there in various ways, revealing an insidious monster that penetrates souls and prevents them from receiving the abundant life Christ promised. Of course, spoken in such clear fashion, the idea is laughable. Who could really believe they needed to earn God's love? If you ask people, likely most if not all would know in their heads the right answer. Yet, as the prophet Jeremiah put it, "more torturous than all else is the human heart" (17:9).
This false belief that we need to earn God's love appears beneath the visage of everything from scrupulosity and perfectionism to affected piety and hypocrisy. In each case you can trace back the problem to the root sin of pride.
Diagnosing pride's sinfulness in this case, however, merely returns us to the need to be humble enough to receive God's love and hence back to the beginning of the vicious cycle of needing to earn God's love. Yet, as Saint Paul said: "There is no condemnation in Christ Jesus" (Rom 8:1). Also, Jesus Himself says: "Is there no one who condemns you? Neither do I condemn you" (see John 8:10-11).
Certainly pride exists within our hearts, but let us look beyond this sin to other forces at work in our subconscious minds and hearts. As Americans, we live in a country founded on a principle often known as the "Protestant work ethic." That idea essentially amounts to the need to work hard that we might achieve everything by our own efforts (and hence extends easily to spirituality with the idea of needing to earn even God's approval and love).
Furthermore, American ideals arose out of the principles of the Enlightenment whose thinkers essentially eschewed Christianity for Secular Humanism. Instead of God being responsible for all that was good and the sole arbiter of goodness, mankind took that role for these thinkers who believed in the supremacy of reason and science. Isn't it ironic that such a perspective would then invade Catholicism itself which Enlightenment thinkers had rejected? Yet to me it seems it has: we have somehow absorbed this false idea that we of our own power must achieve human perfection. Yes, that is what it means to believe that we must earn God's love: it means to believe that we are responsible for our own sanctification rather than merely accepting His free gift to us. Take that to its logical extreme and it means that we believe we do not need God; we essentially make ourselves our own god.
Before you find my perspective too cynical, however, let us look even deeper into the human psyche. As intelligent beings, we naturally seek the cause for every effect. Consequently, when some negative emotion assaults our hearts, we immediately want to know the purpose. If we feel bad, we want to know why. We want to know whose fault it is. We are not content to remain ignorant. Hence we either look outward for a scapegoat, blaming someone or something else, or we look inward, blaming ourselves.
The latter perspective, seen in the light of religious tradition, becomes that much-referenced catholic guilt. The phrase is suitable because of the meaning of the word catholic: universal: we all feel guilt when we know we have transgressed our moral code.
One common response to that guilt is to lower one's standards to the point at which one can no longer transgress them and thus cannot experience that negative emotion. For this reason, many believe that we ought to repudiate religion, and specifically Catholicism, because it causes people to feel guilty, which leads to a vicious cycle of psychologically-unhealthy responses to spirituality. Now I would argue that by that same logic we ought to outlaw food because it causes people to feel cravings, which lead them to overindulge and become gluttonous.
On the opposite side of the spectrum, someone might become so focused on pious practices as to be rigidly bound up in them and demand that all others abide by the same rules. Everyone else thus must be wrong in order to preserve that fragile shell of security formed by legalism.
As Aristotle so aptly pointed out, the virtue must lie between the two extremes. What, then, is the answer?
Love.
Perhaps that might seem too simple an answer. Let me put it another way:
God.
Yes. God is Love. Therefore, we can say also that Love is God.
Consequently, if your encounter with the Truth has been anything less than an encounter with Love than you have not truly found God. Furthermore, I'll wager a guess that if you find within yourself on some level the belief that you must earn God's love that it is because you believe also that you are unlovable.
Do you recognize that lie within yourself?
That is the lie masked by the belief that you must earn God's love along with all its various permutations. If you believe that you must do something in order to be loved, whether by God or by anyone else, then you believe that you are lovable based upon what you do rather than who you are.
Modern psychology will happily point out to you the importance of your childhood development for the formation of your image of God. Now before you happily blame your parents so you don't have to feel guilty about having a false idea of God (as you do if you believe you must earn His love), let me point out to you that they could not give you what they themselves had never received. How could they show you that you were loved unconditionally if they had not themselves believed in and received unconditional love? In this fallen world few of us have received that love. Perhaps we flee it because it is too much for us. Perhaps we flee it because we are afraid.
Fear.
If you look again at those two responses to guilt, you might see fear operating beneath them both. The same is true for the idea that we must earn God's love: for if we can earn it, then we are in control of it, and it is far more comfortable to think of being in control than of facing the infinite God who is the Unknown who yet stoops down to us that we might know Him.
"Perfect love casts out fear." (1 John 4:18)
Only God's infinite and unconditional love can cast the fear out from our hearts, but we must let Him, and that letting Him seems to be a life-long process. It seems to take so much to unravel the knots we tie about ourselves. Sometimes perhaps it may seem futile and we may wonder why He allows us to tangle ourselves so deeply in the lies of the enemy, but there we are left with the mystery of iniquity, the mystery proclaimed in the Easter Exultet as "O Happy Fault!" Only a God of infinite love could bring good out of the dark shadow that sin and shame cast over our hearts.
Take courage, then, in whatever darkness you walk and listen to the wisdom of Saint John Paul II whose feast day we celebrate today: "I plead with you — never, ever give up on hope, never doubt, never tire, and never become discouraged. Be not afraid."
It takes great courage to open your heart to God and to allow yourself to be vulnerable enough to encounter Him in the depths of your being where He speaks love through His silent presence, imperceptible to your senses.
Will you let yourself be loved? Sometimes I think that is the most difficult thing in all the world.
Thus I leave you with the resounding words of Saint John Paul II, taken from Christ's own words in Scripture:
"Duc in altum! Put out into the deep! Be not afraid."